Justice 4 ALL Madeleine McCann Family
You need to be a member of this forum in order to view its entire contents.
We welcome applications to join the forum from genuine caring compassionate people that wish to support Mr Mrs McCann in their never ending resolve to finding their daughter Madeleine and bringing her back home where she truly belongs.

All applicants are checked out so people with no sense, no moral compass, no rationality and only half a brain cell and even less grip on reality and who are devoid of all logic - need NOT apply!
This also applies to ex-members, who no longer want to be members, yet spend their lives viewing this forum and telling people they no longer want to be members.
This is said without prejudice with no one in particular in mind.

LATEST CARTER RUCK LETTER TO BENNETTT

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: LATEST CARTER RUCK LETTER TO BENNETTT

Post by vee8 on Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:00 am

May wrote:He might decide to represent himself and give us all a good laugh!

"A solicitor who represents himself has a fool for a client!"
avatar
vee8
Grand Member
Grand Member

Number of posts : 3113
Location : suffolk
Registration date : 2008-06-24

http://www.madeleine-adestinybegun.co.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: LATEST CARTER RUCK LETTER TO BENNETTT

Post by dianeh on Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:49 am

Does he not realise that nothing this policeman has said in court is proved or can be proved ergo it is hearsay and for Bennett to repeat it outside a court is actually committing libel and the same goes for everyone connected with Bennett.

Rosie, I meant to say earlier that I believe that Bennett does not realise it. The policeman who wrote the interim report is exempt from libel, as he was acting in his professional capacity. But that report has now been supseded by a new report, written by the prosecutors, so has a high standing, and the original report is no longer valid. Even the original author would not be able to insist that the conclusions of the original report are correct, as it contradicts a higher authority. Yet here we have Bennett, continually doing so.

I believe that he is so dense that he doesnt realise that to continually use the interim report as facts, that he is committing libel. Just because that document was published doesnt make it true. The only report that should be quoted from is the final one, and even then, it must be quoted properly and not used out of context.
avatar
dianeh
Grand Member
Grand Member

Number of posts : 3465
Age : 53
Location : Outback, Australia
Registration date : 2008-04-27

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum