Jane Tanner did NOT identify Murat.

So bennett is talking b*ll*cks again. If JT is aware of his writings I would advise her to sue, as soon as possible, because bennett is twisting and lying AGAIN.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-495092/Tapas-Nine-witness-says-Mediterranean-man-took-Madeleine.html#ixzz0fQ0hFeMR

The woman who believes she saw Madeleine McCann being abducted revealed yesterday that she has never named Robert Murat to police as the man she saw.
Instead, Jane Tanner, 36, thinks he was "Mediterranean looking".
Miss Tanner, one of the so- called Tapas Nine, says she remains "stricken with guilt" over failing to prevent the abduction.
"I felt I could have stopped this all from happening," she said. "I think of that every day. I have to live with it for ever, that guilt is never going to go away."
But she admitted: "I simply don't know if I could identify again the man I saw that night. I've never pointed the finger at Robert Murat because I simply don't know if it was him or not.
"I would say the man I saw was more local, or Mediterranean looking, rather than British. He had dark, almost black, long hair and had swarthy skin.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-495092/Tapas-Nine-witness-says-Mediterranean-man-took-Madeleine.html#ixzz0fQNlbj4t

Just read tweets on Keir Simmons

http://twitter.com/keirsimmonsitv

Murat to sue JT? Good luck with that.

JM is now reporting that the charge against Jane is calumny.

Told you... 'It' (JO) could be sued by Tanner.

May wrote:JM is now reporting that the charge against Jane is calumny.

She is a mental case and needs to . Sue me Moron for calumny (posh word for slander)

If this is "true" I'll kiss Gonc's ass, do you think I'd risk doing that?

maria wrote:Told you... 'It' (JO) could be sued by Tanner.

whats /who is jo?

kazcut wrote:

maria wrote:Told you... 'It' (JO) could be sued by Tanner.

whats /who is jo?

Morais, Kaz!

christabel wrote:

kazcut wrote:

maria wrote:Told you... 'It' (JO) could be sued by Tanner.

whats /who is jo?

Morais, Kaz!

god im so lost i feel like the whole case is slipping past me ,
poor madeleine god i wish i could help her .
all these bloody he is suing she is suing

considering it was amaral who made the police keep an eye on murat "first" even before how many people said they saw him ?
tanner wasnt even in the fight off with murat ,
i wonder if he will sue everyone who pointed the finger ,to be honest i just cant see murat doing this alone ,i hope he hasnt been forced in any way if true
god confused.com

Excellent point from Bonny

I wonder why it doesn't seem to have occurred to them that it is just a bit odd that one UK citizen should be "suing" another UK citizen in Portugal?
Does that not set any alarm bells ringing?
Especially given that UK payments are much higher and it will take decades to go through Portuguese courts?

http://justathoughtyouknow.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=guests&action=display&thread=313&page=65

See this is how thick morose is

From JM site
From the Portuguese Penal Code [Rectification to the CPP n.º 102/2007, of 31/10]:
Artcle 365.º - Calumnious Denunciation
1- Whom, by any means, before the authority or publicly, with the knowledge of falsity of the imputation, denounces or casts upon a determined person the suspicion of the practice of crime, with intent that against her it is placed a legal proceeding, shall be punished with imprisonment up to 3 years or with a fine.

Seems to me that the McCanns could be suing lots of people under calumny rules!

2 - If the conduct consists in the false imputation of unlawful fact or disciplinary penalty, the agent is punished with imprisonment of up to 1 year or a fine of up to 120 days.
3 - If the means used by the agent is traduced in presenting, altering or distort evidence, the agent is punished:
a) In the case of nº1, with imprisonment up to 5 years;
b) In the case of nº 2, with imprisonment up to 3 years or a fine.
4 - If from the fact results the deprivation of liberty of the offended, the agent is punished with imprisonment of 1 up to 8

Seems to me that the McCanns could sue hundreds of people under these rules!!!!!!!!!

Sorry LOL don't know what happened to my previous post.

IMO I think its yet another distraction from the amaral court proceedings, they know they backed a loser with amaral, so instead, they now support Murat and make up stories about one of the Tapas (JT). It adds another dimension for them, why stop at the McCanns when they have 7 other Tapa's group to attack?
Why not ask Murat directly if its true? As if we need to!

Peaceful1 there's a lot of people who's thinking it's a distraction for what tomorrows news brings.

Of course it is Cath, they'll have egg on their faces, so best way is to start yet another rumour (lie)..
Shows what sad gits they are really.