Justice 4 ALL Madeleine McCann Family
You need to be a member of this forum in order to view its entire contents.
We welcome applications to join the forum from genuine caring compassionate people that wish to support Mr Mrs McCann in their never ending resolve to finding their daughter Madeleine and bringing her back home where she truly belongs.

All applicants are checked out so people with no sense, no moral compass, no rationality and only half a brain cell and even less grip on reality and who are devoid of all logic - need NOT apply!
This also applies to ex-members, who no longer want to be members, yet spend their lives viewing this forum and telling people they no longer want to be members.
This is said without prejudice with no one in particular in mind.

Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Rosie on Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:17 am

This in my opinion proves that Bennett is stalking Kate and Gerry McCann and the whole thread on the 3 arguidos is tantamount to inciting hatred and stalking. Isn't this against the law in this country? (Screenshots Have Been Taken)


Tony Bennett
Post subject: Re: SKY NEWS GERRY McCann (LIVE)


Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:25 pm



Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:49 pm
Posts: 1931
Location: Harlow, Essex

BRIEF REPORT FROM DCMS SELECT COMMITTEE

I've read most of the thread so far.

There was a clear purpose to my taking a seat right behind Dr Gerald McCann. It was to send out a quiet message that we - and I speak for all of us here - are looking over his shoulder, checking out what he and his Team area saying, watching them.

It was clearly not an appropriate setting in which to make any sort of visible challenge, which would have been enormously counter-productive.

Debbie/doris was also there, sitting at the side where Clarence Mitchell and Dr McCann had a clear view of her.

Also present was RubyTwoShoes from this forum - and both of them may post their own observations later tonight.

Dr McCann, Adam Tudor and Clarence Mitchell all scuttled off immediately the session ended.

The MPs remained behind talking. Debbie/doris approached Paul Farrrelly M.P., the M.P. who asked the clearly planted question at the end about newspaper blogs and the internet. She offered him a '60 Reasons' booklet, which he declined to take, saying: "I know about it and I haven't got time to read it". Debbie/doris then asked if she could hand a copy to one of the M.P.s - and the Chairman of the Select Committee, John Whittingdale M.P., took a copy, albeit reluctantly.

Debbie/doris may fill you in on her conversation with the M.P.s later, which lasted about 4-5 minutes.

Right at the end, Clarence Mitchell, amongst his snide and dismissive comments about those discussing the Madeleine McCann case on the internet, said something like: "There are people out there on the internert conducting what amounts to a 'war of attrition'.

Well, he's not wrong there.

We had a long conversation with a 'Daily Mail' journalist and gave him a '60 Reasons' booklet.

Sorry, no time to post more as I'm going to hear the country's top criminal profiler, Dr Wilson, speak tonight at nearby Haileybury College, Hertford Heath

Click Here For;.......... Proof Of Bennett's Stalking and Incitement To Hatred


And Bennett is the person that has reported people to Essex Police for harassment? It beggars belief doesn't it?

Here is Tony Bennett sitting directly behind Gerry McCann at the select Committee meeting and Bennett complains about being harassed? he is a joke, nothing but an obnoxious joke!

_________________
no way
Goncalo Amaral Your Time Is Nearly Up!


"RICARDO PAIVA SHOULD RESIGN, HIS POSITION IS UNTENABLE - IF HE DOES NOT RESIGN, THEN SACK HIM!
avatar
Rosie
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 4358
Registration date : 2008-04-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Guest on Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:19 am

It was clearly not an appropriate setting in which to make any sort of
visible challenge, which would have been enormously counter-productive.

Everything he touches becomes counterproductive, it sums up his whole life.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Guest on Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:28 am

Bennett IS harrassing Kate and Gerry. There are many instances and no doubt they have all been noted Rosie. His whole campaign to gain support for re opening the investigation on HIS terms, by passing the PJ is arrogant and insulting. His meetings and leaflets full of utter rubbish but given an air of officialism by the fact he had a brush with being a solicitor and had a brush at being a politician are nothing more than indirect punishment for Kate and Gerry.

He knows the PJ wont re open the case on HIS terms. He knows his campaign is futile if success means the case is re opened. He also knows that if he can gather enough publicity by association with 3A's and Amaral he can spit in the eye of Kate and Gerry.

The man is a hypocrite, a bully, a cruel and pathetic excuse of a man. How dare he pronounce that he does what he does for Madeleines sake. How dare he pronounce that he does what he does for a dead Madeleine when he knows no such thing.

Tony Bennett, you are a wanker. Sue me!!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Guest on Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:39 am

He wont sue anyone imo.
His whole campaign will unravel before him if he does and he knows it.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by bluj1515 on Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:27 am

ModNrodder wrote:Bennett IS harrassing Kate and Gerry. There are many instances and no doubt they have all been noted Rosie. His whole campaign to gain support for re opening the investigation on HIS terms, by passing the PJ is arrogant and insulting. His meetings and leaflets full of utter rubbish but given an air of officialism by the fact he had a brush with being a solicitor and had a brush at being a politician are nothing more than indirect punishment for Kate and Gerry.

He knows the PJ wont re open the case on HIS terms. He knows his campaign is futile if success means the case is re opened. He also knows that if he can gather enough publicity by association with 3A's and Amaral he can spit in the eye of Kate and Gerry.

The man is a hypocrite, a bully, a cruel and pathetic excuse of a man. How dare he pronounce that he does what he does for Madeleines sake. How dare he pronounce that he does what he does for a dead Madeleine when he knows no such thing.

Tony Bennett, you are a wanker. Sue me!!

His refusal to bow at the sight of Amaral and the PJ completely is why he is losing control of portions of the 3As, I believe.

His terms are much like Al Qaeda's - unrealistic and destructive.
avatar
bluj1515
Grand Member
Grand Member

Number of posts : 1017
Location : United States
Registration date : 2009-06-30

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by dianeh on Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:14 am

So there we have it. TB admitting to sending the message to the McCanns "We are watching you". From the horse's mouth so to speak.

I remember when I watched the video of that incident. Both Mitchell and the solicitor, both turned and looked at Bennett, then turned back without even acknowledging him. Gerry never looked at him at all. They chose to not acknowledge his presence. And quite rightly.
avatar
dianeh
Grand Member
Grand Member

Number of posts : 3465
Age : 53
Location : Outback, Australia
Registration date : 2008-04-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by clairesy on Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:59 am

oh my god thats really bad.Hes sat right there behind them like a obsessed freak!!

I think little by little hes actually framing himself here.LOL....way to go benny!!! flower
avatar
clairesy
Grand Member
Grand Member

Number of posts : 2698
Age : 32
Location : uk
Registration date : 2008-06-04

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Peaceful1 on Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:53 pm

By Gerry and CM not acknowledging TB, shows what a small piece of insignificance he is to them.
The look on TB face gives me the creeps. Yuk!
gagging
avatar
Peaceful1
Grand Member
Grand Member

Number of posts : 1104
Location : Australia
Registration date : 2009-07-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Hael on Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:54 pm

Protection from Harassment Act 1997
An Act to make provision for protecting persons from harassment and similar conduct. [21st March 1997]

Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—

England and Wales

1. Prohibition of harassment
(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and
(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
(2) For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a course of conduct if the person who pursued it shows—
(a) that it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
(b) that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
(c) that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable.

2. Offence of harassment
(1) A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 is guilty of an offence.
(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both.
(3) In section 24(2) of the [1984 c. 60.] Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (arrestable offences), after paragraph (m) there is inserted—
“(n) an offence under section 2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (harassment).”.

3. --part omitted-- re: Civil remedy

4. Putting people in fear of violence
(1) A person whose course of conduct causes another to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used against him is guilty of an offence if he knows or ought to know that his course of conduct will cause the other so to fear on each of those occasions.
(2) For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it will cause another to fear that violence will be used against him on any occasion if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause the other so to fear on that occasion.
(3) It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to show that—
(a) his course of conduct was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
(b) his course of conduct was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
(c) the pursuit of his course of conduct was reasonable for the protection of himself or another or for the protection of his or another’s property.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
(b) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
(5) If on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence under this section the jury find him not guilty of the offence charged, they may find him guilty of an offence under section 2.
(6) The Crown Court has the same powers and duties in relation to a person who is by virtue of subsection (5) convicted before it of an offence under section 2 as a magistrates' court would have on convicting him of the offence.
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1

Hael
Learner
Learner

Number of posts : 108
Location : UK
Registration date : 2009-02-11

Back to top Go down

Another Winge From Bennett!

Post by Rosie on Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:03 am

Just a few brief points.

First, I don't think I was seeking sympathy on this thread, it was simply the sharing of information. In my mind there were two purposes to the O.P.:

1) To draw attention again to the massive, well co-ordinated, sustained, vicious and libellous attacks on those - yes, of course there are many others who have suffered as well - who question the McCanns' abduction tale,

and

2) To clarify, if possible, just how far people can go on the internet in terms not just of opinion about someone, but also the gloating delight that is taken by some in publishing and circulating to other directly wholly false and damaging lies.

Already the police have clarified the law so far as Nessling is concerned in that it is clear that Section 43 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 applies to his deliberate circulation of falsehoods about me to others.

As the Essex Police investigations continue - now widened to include several other blogs - I shall update all here, even if at the end of the day, Essex Police come back to me and say: "There's nothing you can do about all those vile and malicious lies, and we can't tell you who the people are that are doing this, so you'll just have to lump it".

That is why I was pleased to see your post here, jasper. You took action, you stood up to them, and you got a result. Well done. There doesn't necessarily have to be a criminal prosecution against Nessling and others like him. The police have a variety of ways of ensuring that people who get much too over-excited calm down a bit. Even if, as it may well turn out, some of these hate blogs are run from abroad, the police do liaise with police forces abroad who may well take action. The Essex Police website indeed refers to this.

Which brings me to 'tylersmum', who has tried once again to introduce a number of extraneous issues to which I am not going to respond. All I will say about 'tylersmum' and 'nicked' and a few others who have been on here is that when eventually their true identities are revealed, we may get some idea of just how close to Team McCann some of them are.

On my article about Robin Page, once the presenter of BBC's One Man and His Dog, I stand by the article. I also stand by the comparison of Robin Page's comments, for which he was arrested and forced to travel some 200 miles, to those I quote from Imran Khan, who was not arrested.

I did circulate my notes to many people at the time, I think in 2001. However, how it ended up on Sean Bryson's site, I don't know, I have nothing to do with his site, I've never met him, and I disagree with a lot of what I've seen on his site from a very brief look.

Back to the real question this thread poses. Why are those who question the McCanns' story of Madeleine being abduced attacked so often, by so many and with such ferocity? Who are these anonymous people (Nessling excepted)? What is their connection or relationship to Team McCann? What is their real motive? And, in law, can they post whatever they like and send it to whoever they like without anyone challenging them?

Finally, thanks again for all the kind messages on this thread, and thanks to all fellow-strugglers for the truth about what really happened to Madeleine McCann.

P.S. Whilst typing this message have had a call from the officer dealing with this matter who has been kind to give me an update. Nothing much to add except that he requires more information about what is being posted where by these pro-McCanners, whom the McCanns know about but keep silent about.


Honestly, do you think this guy is forgetting to take his medication? Do you know he thinks the Hounding of the McCanns blog is NN's? Laffin Laffin Laffin

_________________
no way
Goncalo Amaral Your Time Is Nearly Up!


"RICARDO PAIVA SHOULD RESIGN, HIS POSITION IS UNTENABLE - IF HE DOES NOT RESIGN, THEN SACK HIM!
avatar
Rosie
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 4358
Registration date : 2008-04-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Peaceful1 on Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:59 am

Yes I saw that too.
Tony, for your information, it is NOT Nigel.
I do not know who it is but I do know it is not Nigel.
Nigel is away anyway with his family!!
avatar
Peaceful1
Grand Member
Grand Member

Number of posts : 1104
Location : Australia
Registration date : 2009-07-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by calcite51 on Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:52 pm

Aw, Tony - your day will come when the tables are turned - you will be the one explaining to the police what you were doing sitting behind Gerry McCann.....
avatar
calcite51
Star Poster
Star Poster

Number of posts : 830
Location : Canada
Registration date : 2008-04-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Jayelles on Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:15 pm

To Tony Bennett -

1) what is your mission statement? Is it to have the laws changed in the name of child protection? Or is it to harass the parents of a missing child (namely Kate and Gerry McCann).

2) Have you ever heard of the saying "you catch more flies with honey than vinegar"? If so, don't you think your spiteful, vitriolic and obsessive attacks on the McCanns are going to lose you more support than they will gain you?

Jayelles
Apprentice
Apprentice

Number of posts : 380
Location : Scotland
Registration date : 2009-04-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Jayelles on Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:45 pm

Mulleena wrote:It was clearly not an appropriate setting in which to make any sort of
visible challenge, which would have been enormously counter-productive.

Everything he touches becomes counterproductive, it sums up his whole life.

How true!

Jayelles
Apprentice
Apprentice

Number of posts : 380
Location : Scotland
Registration date : 2009-04-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Proof of Tony Bennett's Stalking The McCanns!

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum