LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
Page 2 of 3 • Share •
Page 2 of 3 •
1, 2, 3 
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
So they are implying that the injuries were caused on three different occasions over a period of 3 weeks?
if a child were sustain injuries like that in just 3 weeks social services would be wondering who done it,not how they done it!!! why should it be different for an adult? You don't sustain injuries to yourself like that.....unless your a clumsy so and so.
And if another inmate battered her then why haven't they come forward in order to protect themselves from getting a battering from the tortures ??I tell ya why...because there is no one to come forward thats why.
IMO if someone in jail had done that to her,then they would have said by now.They would not have kept quiet especially knowing gonc and co were going to court for doing it...they to would of feared ending up getting battered for getting the cops in trouble!!!
_________________
Pro mcCann and proud to be!!!!!!
3A is a cesspit for the lost and confused.
Ignorance is the root to all evilness.

clairesy- Grand Member

- Number of posts: 2444
Age: 35
Location: s,wales valley gal!!
Registration date: 2008-06-03
Translation Part one
Thank you to Maria, who has yet again done some hard work translating these documents for us. She is an absolute star
Mr. António Leandro David Silva address almost illegible Mexilhoeira Grande 8500-000 Portimão
Process 2691/08.5TAFAR Inquest Our reference 4413455 Date 25-06-2009
Subject: NOTIFICATION VIA SINGLE MAIL POST WITH DEPOSIT RECEIPT
You are hereby notified, in the quality of Offended, under the terms and to the effects mentioned below:
That it has been deducted despatch of ACCUSATION, on the abovementioned Inquest, in the terms of art. 283 of the Penal Process Code, of which a copy is annexed, and that stipulates the period of TWENTY DAYS to require, should you so wish, the start of INSTRUCTION, in accoedance to art. 287 number 1 b) of said document, for what you must constitute yourself as assistent.
The request should be addressed to the competent Instruction Judge, not being subjected to special formalities, it should contain a summary of the fact and law reasons why you disagree from the accusation,as well as, whenever that is the case, the means of proof that have not been considered in the Inquest and the facts that through the former and the latter one seeks to prove.
Still within the same period you may deduct, if you so wish, the request of civil indemnity in articulated request, under the terms of art 77, number 2 of Penal Process Code, if you have showed in the files such a wish (art. 75 number 2 of same document).
You also have the period of TEN DAYS from this notification, to decuct private accusation ¾ art. 284 number 1 of same legal document.
Under the terms of art 88 number 3 b) of the PPC you can constitute yourself as assistant within the abovementioned periods.
The abovementioned periods are continuous being suspended, however, during the periods of judicial holidays and they start on the fifth day after the date of of deposit in the mail box of the addresee, as stamped on the envelope (art 113 number 3 of the PPC).
In the case of detained arguido, the periods are not suspended during holidays.
If the periods end on a when the courts are not at work, its limit moves to the next working day.
The Adjoin Justice Specialist [???]
Anabela Lopes dos Santos
Mr. António Leandro David Silva address almost illegible Mexilhoeira Grande 8500-000 Portimão
Process 2691/08.5TAFAR Inquest Our reference 4413455 Date 25-06-2009
Subject: NOTIFICATION VIA SINGLE MAIL POST WITH DEPOSIT RECEIPT
You are hereby notified, in the quality of Offended, under the terms and to the effects mentioned below:
That it has been deducted despatch of ACCUSATION, on the abovementioned Inquest, in the terms of art. 283 of the Penal Process Code, of which a copy is annexed, and that stipulates the period of TWENTY DAYS to require, should you so wish, the start of INSTRUCTION, in accoedance to art. 287 number 1 b) of said document, for what you must constitute yourself as assistent.
The request should be addressed to the competent Instruction Judge, not being subjected to special formalities, it should contain a summary of the fact and law reasons why you disagree from the accusation,as well as, whenever that is the case, the means of proof that have not been considered in the Inquest and the facts that through the former and the latter one seeks to prove.
Still within the same period you may deduct, if you so wish, the request of civil indemnity in articulated request, under the terms of art 77, number 2 of Penal Process Code, if you have showed in the files such a wish (art. 75 number 2 of same document).
You also have the period of TEN DAYS from this notification, to decuct private accusation ¾ art. 284 number 1 of same legal document.
Under the terms of art 88 number 3 b) of the PPC you can constitute yourself as assistant within the abovementioned periods.
The abovementioned periods are continuous being suspended, however, during the periods of judicial holidays and they start on the fifth day after the date of of deposit in the mail box of the addresee, as stamped on the envelope (art 113 number 3 of the PPC).
In the case of detained arguido, the periods are not suspended during holidays.
If the periods end on a when the courts are not at work, its limit moves to the next working day.
The Adjoin Justice Specialist [???]
Anabela Lopes dos Santos
_________________

Rosiepops- Admin

- Number of posts: 3805
Registration date: 2008-04-26
Part Two
Send to General Districtal Prosecutor of Évora
*
Investigate the Social Security number of the offended
*
Notify the Portimão Hospital on the usual terms
*
Notify. Nothing being requested, distribute
*
Investigate the Social Security number of the offended
*
Notify the Portimão Hospital on the usual terms
*
Notify. Nothing being requested, distribute
The Public Ministry accuses in ORDINARY PROCESS, WITH INTERVENTION OF THE COLECTIVE COURT:
GONÇALO SOUSA AMARAL, married, Polícia Judiciária Inspector, son of Onofre do Amaral and Maria de Lurdes Sousa Amaral, born the 2nd October 1959, at Torredeita, Viseu, resident at R. Júdice [illegible], 11 3ºa, Portimão.
As there are enough incidia in the files that:
On the date of the facts that will be described, the author was coordinator of the regional section of combat of banditry and drug trafic investigation, of the Directory of Faro of the Polícia Judiciária. In that quality he was coordinating the police action of inquest number 2927/07,OTAFAR of the Public Ministry Services of Portimão, where the causes of minor Joana Cipriano disappearance were being investigated. On the course of such investigations, on the 13th October 2004, in the afternoon, the arguido and two other Polícia Judiciária Agents, that was not possible to identify, picked up António Leandro David Silva, id at pages 27, from his residence at Figueira, Portimão, and drove him, in a PJ car, to the Directory of Faro of Polícia Judiciária premises, with the objective of questioning him with relation to the mentioned disappearance, as Leandro Silva lived with Joana and her Mother Leonor Cipriano. So, about 10 minutes after 20 hours of the same day, in na office, located on the first floor, of mentioned premises, the Polícia Judiciária Inspector Marques Bom proceeded to the questioning of Leandro Silva ¾ pages 61 to 64 here given as reproduced for all legal effects.¾ In these declarations Leandro Silva refered, in summary, that Leonor Cipriano had told him that she abandoned the cadaver of Joana in a derelict house in the Figueira surroundings.
_________________

Rosiepops- Admin

- Number of posts: 3805
Registration date: 2008-04-26
Part Three
Afterwards, the arguido told Silva that he could go, having this one moved towards the stairs that led to the lower level to do as told. When he was already moving downstairs, two agents of the Polícia Judiciária, that was not possible to identify, held Leandro Silva, one at each arm, thus immobilising him, while the arguido moved towards him from the back and grabbed him by the neck with both hands and, later, moved to his front hitting him with several fists on the abdomen and slaps on the face, telling him at the same time to tell where Joana was.
As direct consequence of these agressions Leandro suffered the lesions described and examined at pages 38 and 45 to 47, here given as reproduced for all legal effects, namely "contusion of costal [???]grid" which caused him 15 (fifteen) days of illness, 5 (five) of them with incapacity to work.
The arguido and the mentioned unidentified agents acted together and in coordination, willing to cause Leandro Silva the mentioned lesions and in this way to impair his capacity of determination and leading him to give some other statements, where he would present another version about the place where the minor could be found.
The arguido acted deliberately, freely and counsciously.
He knew that such behaviour was forbidden by law.
He commited, as explained, as co-author, a crime of torture [illegible] by the art 243 number 1 i) and [illegible] , of the Penal Code.
PROOF
A Documents from the files, namely pages 37, 38, 44 to 47, and 61 to 64;
B Testimonies
António Leandro David da Silva, id pages 27;
Maria Lurdes David, id pages 48;
Carlos Alberto Pinto da Silva, id pages 71;
Sara Patrícia David da Silva, id pages 89;
Dr. Aníbal Coutinho, expert doctor from Medico-Legal[???] Faro Office, id pages 47
There are no indications of any of the dangers listed in art 204 of the Penal Process Code, so it is sugested that the arguido waits for the forthcoming legal proccedings with term of identity and residence according to art 196 of same document.
(José Fonte Santa)
As direct consequence of these agressions Leandro suffered the lesions described and examined at pages 38 and 45 to 47, here given as reproduced for all legal effects, namely "contusion of costal [???]grid" which caused him 15 (fifteen) days of illness, 5 (five) of them with incapacity to work.
The arguido and the mentioned unidentified agents acted together and in coordination, willing to cause Leandro Silva the mentioned lesions and in this way to impair his capacity of determination and leading him to give some other statements, where he would present another version about the place where the minor could be found.
The arguido acted deliberately, freely and counsciously.
He knew that such behaviour was forbidden by law.
He commited, as explained, as co-author, a crime of torture [illegible] by the art 243 number 1 i) and [illegible] , of the Penal Code.
PROOF
A Documents from the files, namely pages 37, 38, 44 to 47, and 61 to 64;
B Testimonies
António Leandro David da Silva, id pages 27;
Maria Lurdes David, id pages 48;
Carlos Alberto Pinto da Silva, id pages 71;
Sara Patrícia David da Silva, id pages 89;
Dr. Aníbal Coutinho, expert doctor from Medico-Legal[???] Faro Office, id pages 47
PERSONAL SITUATION
There are no indications of any of the dangers listed in art 204 of the Penal Process Code, so it is sugested that the arguido waits for the forthcoming legal proccedings with term of identity and residence according to art 196 of same document.
Faro, 28th of June 2009
The Public Prosecutor
The Public Prosecutor
(José Fonte Santa)
_________________

Rosiepops- Admin

- Number of posts: 3805
Registration date: 2008-04-26
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
The Public Ministry of Faro accuses the former PJ inspector, Gonçalo Amaral, over a crime of torture in a case of alleged aggressions against Leandro Silva, a former partner of the mother of Joana, the little girl from the village of Figueira that went missing in 2004
_________________

Rosiepops- Admin

- Number of posts: 3805
Registration date: 2008-04-26
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
Rosiepops wrote:The Public Ministry of Faro accuses the former PJ inspector, Gonçalo Amaral, over a crime of torture in a case of alleged aggressions against Leandro Silva, a former partner of the mother of Joana, the little girl from the village of Figueira that went missing in 2004
So, it's official now then!!!
WOW WEE!
The Authorities have accused GONC. over the torture
PHWAR! It's all coming unravelled at long last. Thanks for the news Rosie!!
:dog: :dog: :dog: :dog: :dog: :dog: :dog: :dog: :dog: :dog: :dog: :dog:

sadie- Star Poster

- Number of posts: 953
Location: UK
Registration date: 2008-11-21
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
Exactly Sadie, layer by layer!
It comes to those that wait, and boy have we waited for this!
I hope Amaral never ever gets a moments peace again.
It comes to those that wait, and boy have we waited for this!
I hope Amaral never ever gets a moments peace again.

Tinkerbell43- Admin

- Number of posts: 1093
Age: 45
Registration date: 2008-04-18
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
Tinkerbell43 wrote:Exactly Sadie, layer by layer!
It comes to those that wait, and boy have we waited for this!
I hope Amaral never ever gets a moments peace again.
Me too.and more...punishment for the rest of his days and his conscience to let him fully realise what a damned dis-service he has done to poor Madeleine and her family.......Bstrd


Catkins- Star Poster

- Number of posts: 898
Location: UK
Registration date: 2009-02-10
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
I think I might allow myself another of my tick-tocks!!
TICK,
TOCK,
TICK,
TOCK!
TICK,
TOCK,
TICK,
TOCK!
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
We have the official documents on here, although you have to read through all the legal stuff to find it and we had to have them translated.
We were emailed them other day, I did put them up. Perhaps I should have given them their own thread.
Remember we were talking about the confusing part where Leandro was saying he got beaten.
But this was because there were two alleged aggressions x 1 when they were trying to extract the first confession of murder and then x 2 when the PJ having beaten a confession out of the witnesses, wanted to know where the body of Joana was, but of course, no one could tell them, because no one knew, because they did not kill Joana, so the PJ invented a story that Leonor and Joao cut the body up and fed it to the pigs and then made them to confess to this.
Same sort of thing they tried to say happened in the case of missing Madeleine McCann, where Amaral accused them of concealing the body of Madeleine in numerous fridge freezers before disposing of it. Apparently Amaral said that they kept swapping the body from one fridge freezer to another so it would not be detected, so one has to ask.......
If Amaral really believed this nonsense, then why did he not have Eddie sniff ALL the fridge freezers in ALL of the apartments where the friends stayed?
We were emailed them other day, I did put them up. Perhaps I should have given them their own thread.
Remember we were talking about the confusing part where Leandro was saying he got beaten.
But this was because there were two alleged aggressions x 1 when they were trying to extract the first confession of murder and then x 2 when the PJ having beaten a confession out of the witnesses, wanted to know where the body of Joana was, but of course, no one could tell them, because no one knew, because they did not kill Joana, so the PJ invented a story that Leonor and Joao cut the body up and fed it to the pigs and then made them to confess to this.
Same sort of thing they tried to say happened in the case of missing Madeleine McCann, where Amaral accused them of concealing the body of Madeleine in numerous fridge freezers before disposing of it. Apparently Amaral said that they kept swapping the body from one fridge freezer to another so it would not be detected, so one has to ask.......
If Amaral really believed this nonsense, then why did he not have Eddie sniff ALL the fridge freezers in ALL of the apartments where the friends stayed?
_________________

Rosiepops- Admin

- Number of posts: 3805
Registration date: 2008-04-26
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
Rosiepops wrote:
If Amaral really believed this nonsense, then why did he not have Eddie sniff ALL the fridge freezers in ALL of the apartments where the friends stayed?
Er....because he's a moronic f*ckwit, who couldn't even work out which way round to sit on a toilet seat?
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
Hey Vee,
Tickety tock
tickerty tock
tickerty tock
tickerty t
.................we need to practice it now. Times getting close!
Tickety tock
tickerty tock
tickerty tock
tickerty t
.................we need to practice it now. Times getting close!


sadie- Star Poster

- Number of posts: 953
Location: UK
Registration date: 2008-11-21
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
I have already stated, with conviction, over on PFA2, that before twelve months are up, gonzo will be behind bars! It is really getting under the skin of student, the resident WUM!
But I'll say it again, on here. Twelve months, max, and gonzo is doing time.
But I'll say it again, on here. Twelve months, max, and gonzo is doing time.
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
I pray, Vee, you are right because rightfully Gonzo deserves to be behind bars. He'll have some visitors though, Clawsie, Joana, his wife......

calcite51- Star Poster

- Number of posts: 712
Age: 56
Location: Canada
Registration date: 2008-04-26
Re: LATEST ON CIPRIANO CASE
calcite51 wrote:I pray, Vee, you are right because rightfully Gonzo deserves to be behind bars. He'll have some visitors though, Clawsie, Joana, his wife......
Just at Christmas?


sadie- Star Poster

- Number of posts: 953
Location: UK
Registration date: 2008-11-21
Page 2 of 3 •
1, 2, 3 
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum




